I'll begin by saying that I find common ground with E. M. Forster, the individualist. He states "I hate the idea of causes, and if I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friend I hope I should have the guts to betray my country" (167). I certainly couldn't agree more! Before I continue further, I should briefly elaborate on the purpose of government as a foundation for my arguement. Man, as an individual, can be assumed to be totally free before joining a government. No act or desire is prohibited that cannot be acquired by force, guile, or other interaction. In this state of freedom, each Man is equally free and equally vulnerable to the cruelties of his peers. Government offers protection and order at the cost of certain liberties. If a man finds the cost to be outweighed by the benefit, he joins the government and obeys the rules. This is the purpose of government, to suit the needs of those who operate under its strictures.
Here's a fun question: what if the government you've supported no longer stands for what it once did? Such was the case in Germany, when Hitler dismantled a republic and replaced it with a dictatorship. A system that once supported free thought became one that squelched it, often violently. Patriotism is only valuable if the government you support is supporting you! Forster knew this, which is why he said what he did. Ultimately, all we have is ourselves and our loyal friends. We know them by face and name, just as they know us. Why trade that away to become another member of the faceless collective mob?
The workings of ants are remarkably impressive. They labor and travel in perfect lines and formations, operating with the greatest efficiency capable and constructing massive mounds that must seem as mountains to creatures so small. All this is done at the direction of a queen, so that the colony may continue to exist and thrive. Ants exist solely to continue thier own existence. humans, on the other hand, have the amazing power of creativity. This is a power that Forster treasures (along with myself I might add), and what seperates us from the more instinctive creatures of the world. When we sacrifice our individuality, for a nation or other cause, we regress back to being little more than really large ants led by a "dictator-hero" (172). Through criticism and free exchange of thought we can do more than mold stone and steel. We can explore the wonders of our existence more deeply than any ant ever could. Life is too short to be building someone else's grand dream. Forster knew this then, and I know it now.
Divided we stand. United we fall (backwards).
National Gallery on Writing
16 years ago